Showing posts with label Federal. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Federal. Show all posts

Sunday, January 31, 2010

FED. LEG - Bills in Congress under topic of Positive Behavior Supports, and regulation of physical restraint and seclusion in schools

While attention is focused on the states, with numerous bills and, in many cases, short legislative calendars, it seems prudent to review the status of Federal legislation currently before the U.S. Congress. This post is a brief round-up and reminder of those under the topic of Positive Behavior Supports, and the regulation of physical restraint and seclusion in U.S. Schools.

The bills below may be of interest to practicing behavior analysts, those who work in schools, and those who are interested in regulation and training in the matter of physical restraint and seclusion.  HR 4247 and S. 2680 are bills that have the attention of the public and the active interest of a large number of advocacy organizations.
--------------------------
Resources and Related past posts

Thursday, December 17, 2009
S. 2860 bill on restraint and seclusion joins HR 4247 & Wrightslaw sums up this legislation

Autism Votes

Thomas.gov 
legislative information from the Library of Congress

-----------
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG or SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website, http://www.abainternational.org

Friday, January 29, 2010

ANNOUNCE & REQUEST FOR COMMENT: Obama Administration issues rules requiring parity in treatment of mental, substance use disorders

**2/3/10 9:50 AM PST -Update to reflect current location of the interim final rules - prior link no longer valid**

Today the U.S. Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Treasury issued the awaited interim final rules [http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-2167.pdf http://www.federalregister.gov/OFRupload/OFRData/2010-02167_PI.pdf ] resulting from passage of the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA). The notice/press release below outlines changes resulting from the passage of MHPAEA, and requests comment during a comment period of 90 days on certain areas of the interim final rules. While the notice/press release is retained in full, some areas have been highlighted and bulleted to emphasize important areas of the law's requirements, areas that comment are being requested for, how to submit comments on the MHPEA interim rules, and how to request materials in an alternative accessible format.
----------------------------------------

Paul Wellstone, Pete Domenici Parity Act prohibits discrimination

WASHINGTON, Jan. 29 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The U.S. Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Treasury today jointly issued new rules providing parity for consumers enrolled in group health plans who need treatment for mental health or substance use disorders.
"Today's rules will bring needed relief to families faced with meeting the cost of obtaining mental health and substance abuse services," said U.S. Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis. "The benefits will give these Americans access to greatly needed medical treatment, which will better allow them to participate fully in society. That is not just sound policy, it's the right thing to do."

"The rules we are issuing today will, for the first time, help assure that those diagnosed with these debilitating and sometimes life-threatening disorders will not suffer needless or arbitrary limits on their care," said Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius.  "I applaud the longstanding and bipartisan effort that made these important new protections possible."

"Workers covered by group health plans who need mental health and substance abuse care deserve fair treatment," said Deputy Treasury Secretary Neal Wolin. "These rules expand on existing protections to ensure that people don't face unnecessary barriers to the treatment they need."
The new rules prohibit group health insurance plans — typically offered by employers — from restricting access to care by limiting benefits and requiring higher patient costs than those that apply to general medical or surgical benefits. The rules implement the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA).

MHPAEA greatly expands on an earlier law, the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996, which required parity only in aggregate lifetime and annual dollar limits between the categories of benefits and did not extend to substance use disorder benefits. 

The new law requires that 
  • any group health plan that includes mental health and substance use disorder benefits along with standard medical and surgical coverage must treat them equally in terms of out-of-pocket costs, benefit limits and practices such as prior authorization and utilization review.  
  • These practices must be based on the same level of scientific evidence used by the insurer for medical and surgical benefits.  
    • For example, a plan may not apply separate deductibles for treatment related to mental health or substance use disorders and medical or surgical benefits.  They must be calculated as one limit. 
  • MHPAEA applies to employers with 50 or more workers whose group health plans choose to offer mental health or substance use disorder benefits 
  • The new rules are effective for plan years beginning on or after July 1, 2010.
The Wellstone-Domenici Act is named for two dominant figures in the quest for equal treatment of benefits.   The late Sen. Paul Wellstone, D-Minn., who was a vocal advocate for parity throughout his Senate career, sponsored the ultimately successful full parity act.  He was joined by former Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., who first introduced legislation to require parity in 1992.  Champions of the legislation also included the bipartisan team of Rep. Patrick Kennedy, D-R.I., and former Rep. Jim Ramstad, R-Minn.

The issue of parity dates back more than 40 years to President John F. Kennedy, and also was supported by President Clinton and the late Sen. Edward Kennedy.

The interim final rules released today were developed based on the departments' review of more than 400 public comments on how the parity rule should be written.   
Comments on the interim final rules are still being solicited. 
  • Sections where further comments are being specifically sought include so-called "non quantitative" treatment limits such as those that pertain to the 
    • scope and duration of covered benefits, 
    • how covered drugs are determined (formularies) and 
    • the coverage of step-therapies.  
  • Comments are also being specifically requested on the regulation's section on "scope of benefits" or continuum of care.
Comments on the interim final regulation are due 90 days after the publication date.
Comments may be emailed to the federal rulemaking portal at http://www.regulations.gov.
**1/29/10, 1:33pm PST - notice at regulations.gov
"Regulations.gov will undergo a scheduled maintenance outage and will be unavailable from Saturday, January 30, 2010, 8:00 a.m. to Saturday, January 30, 2010, 11:00 a.m. (EST). Thank you for your patience and we regret any inconvenience this outage may cause."**
  • Comments directed to HHS should include the file code CMS-4140-IFC.  
  • Comments to the Department of Labor should be identified by RIN 1210-AB30.  
  • Comments to the Treasury's Internal Revenue Service should be identified by REG-120692-09.  
  • Comments may be sent to any of the three departments and will be shared with the other departments 
    • Please do not submit duplicates.
U.S. Department of Labor releases are accessible on the Internet at http://www.dol.govThe information in this news release will be made available in alternate format (large print, Braille, audio tape or disc) from the COAST office upon request.  Please specify which news release when placing your request at 202-693-7828 or TTY 202-693-7755.  The Labor Department is committed to providing America's employers and employees with easy access to understandable information on how to comply with its laws and regulations.  For more information, please visit http://www.dol.gov/compliance.

SOURCE U.S. Department of Labor

RELATED LINKS
http://www.dol.gov
------------------------------------
For more information:

Federal Register: Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Part IV:
Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, 26 CFR Part 54
Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration, 29 CFR Part 2590
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 45 CFR Part 146
Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008; Final Rule
http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-2167.pdf

Good summary article of the rules release, application and comment submission
Registration required to access.
Interim rule issued on mental health parity
ModernHealthcare.com
By Jessica Zigmond
Posted: January 29, 2010 - 5:59 am ET


Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG or SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website, http://www.abainternational.org

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

OPPORTUNITY: 2010 Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr. Foundation Public Policy Fellowships

The Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr. Foundation Public Policy Fellowship Program 2010-2011
The Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr. Foundation is seeking exemplary professionals and/or family members of persons with intellectual or developmental disabilities who are currently working or volunteering in the field of inclusive services and supports for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities for an intensive one-year Public Policy Fellowship in Washington, D.C. The purpose of the Fellowship is to prepare both early career and veteran leaders to assume leadership in the public policy arena in their home state and/or nationally. During this one year Fellowship, the successful applicant will learn how federal legislation is initiated, developed, and passed by the Congress, as well as how programs are administered and regulations promulgated by federal agencies.
The application deadline for 2010-2011 is March 5, 2010 by 5:00 P.M. EST
The Fellowship starting date will be negotiated with the successful applicant. The Foundation anticipates up to three fellowships will be awarded for the period July, 2010-June 30, 2011

FULL INFORMATION on application for the Public Policy Fellowship program

The Joseph P. Kennedy Jr. Foundation
----------

-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG or SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website, http://www.abainternational.org

Tuesday, December 22, 2009

FYI: Self-funded Health Insurance Plans and ERISA

With the state legislature sessions opening soon and the likelihood of insurance reform legislation submissions, it seems timely to point out information on reimbursement (and limitations) under self-funded health insurance Plans, and to make note either as an advocate or potential beneficiary of legislation as to the language of a bill (or law) in regards to the matter of self-funded policies.

As noted by Autismvotes, in its webpage, Information for Families With Self-Funded Health Insurance Plans
"Even in the states that have passed autism insurance reform , many children are still unable to receive treatment because they are insured through self-funded plans that are not regulated by the state.  If you work for a large company or government, there is a chance your health plan is a self-funded insurance plan.  For self-funded insurance plans, federal ERISA [Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA)] law preempts most state insurance regulations, including benefit reforms like autism insurance reform..."
Some of the useful resources at Autismvotes are,
  • Self-funded plans: Establishing an autism benefit
  • How Private Health Insurance Works: A Primer
  • Companies with self-insured health plans that have opted to provide coverage for autism therapies
The Association of Professional Behavior Analysts (APBA) also recently published an article on self-insured entities, with pointers on which self-insured companies provide ABA coverage in their policies,
Self-Insured Employers Cover ABA Intervention for Autism and Other Special Needs
Laurie Stuebing, APBA Autism Task Force
APBA Reporter Issue # 3
- February, 2009.

One other useful reference is from the State of Colorado, Division of Insurance - this has some Colorado-specific clauses, but in general is a clear, lay-friendly explanation of ERISA, self-funded plans, and information on departments in the Federal Government dealing with this area.

ERISA -- Employer-sponsored Self-funded Health Benefit Plans
Colorado Division of Insurance January 2009
  • What is ERISA?
  • What is the difference between a health insurance plan and an employer-funded health benefit plan
  • (ERISA)?
  • What steps can I take if I am covered under an ERISA plan and my claim is denied?
  • Who has regulatory authority for ERISA plans?
  • What are required procedures for Employee Welfare Benefit Plans (Self-funded Plans)?
  • What is the “summary plan description” and how does it work?
  • Do states have the authority to regulate Employer-sponsored Self-funded Health Benefit Plans?
  • How many people in Colorado are insured under an employer-sponsored or self-funded health benefit plan (ERISA plan)?
  • Who can provide more information on Employer-Funded Health Benefit Plans?
-----------
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG or SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website, http://www.abainternational.org

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

NEWS: H.R. 4247 - The Preventing Harmful Restraint and Seclusion in Schools Act

 **Updated 12/25/09 to add video from the 112/9/09 press conference**

Earlier today during a press conference, U.S. House Representatives George Miller D- 7th district, CA,  and Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-5th district,WA, unveiled,

The Preventing Harmful Restraint and Seclusion in Schools Act 
H.R. 4247: To prevent and reduce the use of physical restraint and seclusion in schools, and for other purposes



Representative George Miller (CA), Chair of the House Committee on Education and Labor, and co-sponsor of H.R. 4247 - Preventing Harmful Restraint and Seclusion in the Schools Act


This bill would establish the first federal standards to protect students from misuse of restraint and seclusion and ensure the safety of everyone in the classroom. It would apply to public schools, private schools and preschools receiving federal education support.

Specifically H.R. 4247 would:
  • Establish important minimum federal safety standards in schools, similar to the protections already in place in hospitals and other non-medical community based facilities
  • Limit physical restraint and locked seclusion, allowing these interventions only when there is imminent danger of injury, and only when imposed by trained staff;
  • Outlaw mechanical restraints, such as strapping kids to chairs, and prohibit restraints that restrict breathing;
  • Require schools to notify parents after incidents when restraint or seclusion was used;
  • Call on states, within two years of enactment, to establish their own policies, procedures, monitoring and enforcement systems to meet these minimum standards;
  • Encourage states to provide support and training to better protect students and prevent the need for emergency behavioral interventions; and 
  • Increase transparency, oversight and enforcement tools to prevent future abuse.
The Education and Labor Committee plans to mark up the bill early next year.

Excellent Fact Sheets and descriptions are provided at the U.S. House Committee on Education and Labor's website on provisions in The Preventing Harmful Restraint and Seclusion in Schools Act (H.R. 4247) including,

FACT SHEET: Preventing Harmful Restraint and Seclusion in the Schools Act
on December 9, 2009 11:30 AM  Kittredge, Betsy Miller
Protecting All Children in School
also,

Definitions of Terms Used in the Preventing Harmful Restraint and Seclusion in the Schools Act




Curt Decker Executive Director of the National Disabilities Network





Mike Resnick Associate Executive Director of the National School Board Association





Nicole Danhof-Holden and Alan Holden, parents Muskegon, MI


-----------------------------------

Other references and past blog posts

Autism Speaks endorses H.R. 4247

TODAY: Bipartisan Lawmakers to Introduce Legislation to Protect All Children in Schools from Abuse
December 9, 2009 9:08 AM
House Committee on Education and Labor blog

Preventing Harmful Restraint and Seclusion in the Schools Act
December 9, 2009 11:30 AM
House Committee on Education and Labor blog

NEWS: December 9 Introduction of Federal Bill on School Restraint and Seclusion
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG blog

Lawmakers Unveil Restraint And Seclusion Bill To End ‘Nightmare Of Abuse’
Michelle Diament
Disability Scoop, December 9, 2009

Bill aims to protect students from abuse in schools
Patricia E. Bauer, December 9th, 2009

Lawmakers Seek Halt To Abuses Of Disabled Kids In School
National Public Radio Health Blog, December 9, 2009


-----------
Website: Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG and SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website, http://www.abainternational.org

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

NEWS: December 9 Introduction of Federal Bill on School Restraint and Seclusion

 [Edited 12/8/09, 11PM - to add additional useful references - see below**]


On Wednesday December 9, 2010, U.S. House Representatives George Miller D- 7th district, CA,  and Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-5th district,WA are expected to introduce bipartisan legislation in the U.S. House to address a serious national problem of abusive restraint and seclusion within U.S. schools. A press conference is scheduled for 11:00am EST on December 9 which will be webcast from the website of the House Committee on Education and Labor. Senator Chris Dodd, D-CT is anticipated to shortly introduce similar legislation in the U.S. Senate.

The impetus for the bill's creation was a GAO report issued on May 19, 2009 and testimony before the House Committee on Education and Labor which documented cases of inappropriately applied restraint and seclusion resulting in trauma, injury and in some cases, death. The report and testimony illuminated a disturbing situation and evoked strong reactions by the legislators and administration representatives.


The Obama Administrations Education Agenda: Sec. Duncan on Seclusion & Restraint
Education Secretary Arne Duncan responds to the May 19 hearings

Some practices went beyond misapplication to the point of abuse; where procedures meant to be applied in strictly defined situations or as emergency procedures were used routinely and for the purposes of punishment. Issues raised during the May 19 hearings were lack of accountability, training of those applying these procedures, and that there are available underused alternatives such as Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports.


Examining the Abusive and Deadly Use of Seclusion and Restraint in Schools: Rep. Andrews - Q&A
Comments of Representative Rob Andrews, District 1, NJ May 19, 2009 during the House Committee on Education and Labor hearing

Currently there are no Federal policies for these practices in schools - in contrast to hospitals, group homes and residential treatment facilities. States' policies are inconsistent, with only 7 states at the time of the hearing requiring training in use of restraint, and 19 states having no defined standards in the use of restraint and seclusion.


Dodd Discusses New Report on Use of Seclusion and Restraint in Schools
Senator Chris Dodd comments on report, "School is Not Supposed to Hurt: Investigative Report on Abusive
Restraint and Seclusion in Schools". National Disability Rights Network, January 2009
Jan 14, 2009
---------------------
References and past blog posts:

Congress To Address Abusive Restraint And Seclusion In Schools
By Michelle Diament
Disability Scoop
December 7, 2009, updated December 8, 2009

Announcement: FEDERAL LEGISLATION TO BE INTRODUCED!!!!!!!!!
The Coalition for Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
December 7, 2009
[Note: A press release is posted at this site]

**Position Statement of the Association of Professional Behavior Analysts (APBA)
The Use of Restraint and Seclusion as Interventions for Dangerous and Destructive Behaviors
Adopted November 7, 2009

NEWSFLASH: GAO Report and House Committee hearing on Seclusion and Restraint in Public and Private Schools
Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG blog
May 19, 2009
[links to the GAO report, report on the testimony, and other media stories and reports on improper use of restraint and seclusion in schools]

**Use of Restraint and Seclusion in Schools Decried
Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law Reporter
5/27/09

**Report Points Way to School Success for Children with Mental Health Needs
Documents Integration of School-Wide Positive Behavior Support with Mental Health
Bazelon Center for Mental health Law
"...June 7, 2006— “Way to Go—praise for a child and a roadmap for policymakers”..."

**Restraint Rules for Children's Psychiatric Residential Treatment Centers
Bazelon Center for Mental health Law

-----------
Website: Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG and SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website, http://www.abainternational.org

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

ACTION OPPORTUNITY: Online petition requests behavior analysis be included in health care reform

There is currently an online petition to include behavior analysis and Behavior Analysts in the health care legislation currently before Congress,

Senate bill: HR3590: Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act

House bill:  HR3962: Affordable Health Care for America Act

This petition is an individual grassroots initiative and not intended to represent the formal position of, or endorsement by any formal behavior analytic organization or nonprofit.

To date, 2,350 letters and emails have been sent to elected officials in Congress.

Deliberation on health care reform legislation is in progress now, so if you support the goals of the petition,
please visit without delay to view, and add your signature if you support this effort.

-------
Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG or individual SIG member authors and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website,  

Wednesday, July 8, 2009

NEWS: Autism Speaks Launches TV Ad Campaign Calling on Congress to End Insurance Discrimination Against Children with Autism

Autism Speaks, the nation's largest autism science and advocacy organization, launches a new national television advertising campaign calling on Congress to put an end to private insurers' blatant discrimination against children with autism.

New York, NY (PRWEB) July 8, 2009 -- Autism Speaks, the nation's largest autism science and advocacy organization, today launched a new national television advertising campaign highlighting private insurers' blatant discrimination against children with autism and calling on Congress to put an end to it as part of the broader health care reform effort. The thirty-second ad, "Neighbors," will air nationally on CNN, CNBC, and MSNBC.

"Neighbors" depicts two young boys who are next door neighbors - one, whose insurance has given him access to autism therapies is shown playing with other kids; the other, who has been deprived of access to therapies, sits alone on his lawn, socially isolated. The TV spot ends with a call to action, urging the American public to call United States Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to tell them that any national health care reform plan that does not include autism insurance reform is unacceptable.

Short of finding a cure for autism, there is nothing that can have a more significant impact on the lives of people with autism and those who love them than putting an end to insurance discrimination

Fourteen states have already acted to amend insurance laws and require insurers to cover medically-necessary, evidence-based autism therapies. In the other 36 states, insurers explicitly exclude coverage of these behavioral therapies from policies, which places a significant financial burden on families seeking to provide their children with necessary services. Applied behavior analysis therapy (ABA), recognized as an effective, evidence-based treatment for children with autism, costs upward of $50,000 a year - a cost well beyond the means of most American families. A federal law would supersede state laws and require all insurers to cover ABA.
"Short of finding a cure for autism, there is nothing that can have a more significant impact on the lives of people with autism and those who love them than putting an end to insurance discrimination," said Bob Wright, co-founder of Autism Speaks. "During the presidential campaign, President Obama committed to ending autism insurance discrimination, and the pending comprehensive health reform legislation is clearly the way for that promise to be fulfilled. Now is the time to finally right this terrible wrong."

To learn more about Autism Votes, an initiative of Autism Speaks focussed on federal and state legislative advocacy, please visit Autism Votes.


--------
Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG or individual SIG member authors and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed
to their website,

Thursday, June 25, 2009

NEWS: Reports that US House Passes Expansion of Autism Treatment Coverage For Military Dependents Under TRICARE

News stories are coming out saying that the U.S. House of Representatives has approved expansion of mandated autism treatment coverage under TRICARE for military dependents with autism, via an amendment to U.S. HR 2647: To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2010 for military activities of the Department of Defense, to prescribe military personnel strengths for fiscal year 2010, and for other purposes.

We are seeking information on whether or how much the specific language of the amendment to H.R. 2647 replicates the provisions specified in the previously submitted HR 1600: To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for the treatment of autism under TRICARE. (Introduced in House -Rep. Stesak + 20 Co-sponsors).

The proposal still needs approval by the U.S. Senate.

The story reported from 6/25/09 Newsblaze [with links added]
House Passes Congressman Sestak`s Historic Autism Legislation
" Today, the House voted to pass legislation authored by Congressman Joe Sestak (PA-07) to mandate the treatment of autistic children of service personnel under the military's healthcare program (TRICARE). The legislation, which was included as an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act [H.R. 2647: To authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2010 for military activities of the Department of Defense, to prescribe military personnel strengths for fiscal year 2010, and for other purposes. ] , is the successful culmination of a two year effort led by Congressman Sestak to provide treatment for the 13,000 autistic children of military personnel and will serve as a model for similar federal and state efforts.

"With this bill's passage, we have supported the critical needs of many military families and addressed the growing epidemic of autism among children of both military and civilian families. It is unacceptable that 1 in 84 military families are reported to have a child with autism, but receive less than 16 of the 25 minimum recommended hours of therapy," said Congressman Sestak, a member of the House Armed Services Committee and the highest ranking Veteran in Congress.

Under current law, the military's Extended Care Health Option provides limited coverage to military families afflicted by autism. Only five percent of eligible military children receive care because of excessive delays- as long as two year waiting periods- and arbitrary coverage denials..."
FULL ARTICLE describes current coverage and the improvements from Rep. Sestak's amendment.
-------------------------
Other articles:

House Bill Mandates Autism Coverage For Military
By Michelle Diament
Disability Scoop
June 26, 2009


Congressman Sestak Includes Key Provisions in National Defense Authorization Act
June 20,2009
NewsBlaze


Monday, June 8, 2009 Blogpost
NEWS: Federal S. 1169 joins H.R. 1600 to provide for the treatment of autism under TRICARE

--------
Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG or individual SIG member authors and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed
to their website,

Thursday, June 11, 2009

ANNOUNCE: June 16 Subcommittee Meetings of the Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC)

The Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has just announced two Subcommittee meetings on June 16, 2009.

Although on the same day, each Subcommittee's respective webinar is at different times, have different links for registration and different access codes. Please see below for more info on the Subcommittees, times, agendas, registrations, access codes and how to be added to the mailing list for future IACC meeting announcements.
--------------------
Some background on the IACC,
The Interagency Autism Coordinating Committee (IACC) is the Committee that,
"coordinates all efforts within the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) concerning autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Through its inclusion of both Federal and public members, the IACC helps to ensure that a wide range of ideas and perspectives are represented and discussed in a public forum.

The IACC mission is to:
  • Facilitate the efficient and effective exchange of information on ASD activities among the member agencies
  • Coordinate ASD-related activities
  • Increase public understanding of the member agencies' activities, programs, policies, and research by providing a public forum for discussions related to ASD research, screening, education, and interventions
IACC meetings are open to the public and include presentations and discussions about member activities and projects of the IACC. The meetings also include scientific presentations from investigators in the field of ASD research. A portion of each meeting is reserved for public comment. A summary of each meeting is posted on the meetings & events page of the IACC website. "
As noted, the IACC holds regular meetings to which are open to the public and to which the public is invited to attend either in person
(with attendance limited to space available) or by webinar. Below is the most recent announcement for two IACC Subcommittee Meetings. By attending the webinar or registering, you can be added to their email list and receive these notices yourself.

--------------------

[Individuals who plan to attend and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should indicate these needs to the Contact Person, in this case, Ms. Lina Perez, Office of Autism Research Coordination, National Institute of Mental Health, NIH, 6001 Executive Boulevard, NSC, Room 8200, Rockville, MD 20852
Phone: 301-443-6040 or IACCPublicInquiries@mail.nih.gov ]


The agendas for the June 16, 2009 meetings are

For more information on this meeting, or the IACC, please visit www.iacc.hhs.gov.

---------
Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG or individual SIG member authors and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed
to their website,

Monday, June 8, 2009

NEWS: H.R. 2740 "IDEA Fairness Restoration Act" would allow expert witness fees for parents

Congressmen Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) and Pete Sessions (R-TX) introduced H.R. 2740, the IDEA Fairness Restoration Act. This bill would overturn a 2006 Supreme Court decision that prohibits the payment of fees to expert witnesses representing parents in IDEA due process. The fees would only be paid by school systems which are found by the courts to have wrongfully denied an appropriate education to students with disabilities under IDEA.
From the Capitol Insider, Volume 14, Issue 22. June 8, 2009
Disability Collaboration: A Partnership of The Arc & United Cerebral Palsy
To sign up for the Capitol Insider

OpenCongress on H.R. 2740

Other blog posts
H.R. 2740 would amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to permit a prevailing party in an action or proceeding brought to enforce the Act to be awarded expert witness fees and certain other expenses.
Washingtonwatch.com
H.R. 2740: To amend the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act to permit a prevailing party in an action or proceeding brought to enforce the Act to be awarded expert witness fees and certain other expenses.
GovTrack.us
Other references
---------
Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG and SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website,

NEWS: Federal H.R. 2688: Empowered at Home Act would assist home and community-based services for disabilities

On June 3, 2009, H.R. 2688, the Empowered at Home Act of 2009, was introduced in the U.S. House and has been sent to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce (Chairman: Rep. Henry Waxman).

Federal News Long Term Services and Supports

"Representatives Frank Pallone [Jr.] (D-NJ) and Diana DeGette (D-CO) introduced the Empowered at Home Act [of 2009], H.R 2688. This bill would remove barriers to providing home and community-based services (HCBS) under the Medicaid State plan amendment option for individuals in need by
1) increasing the federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP);
2) revising the income eligibility to up to 300% of the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefit rate; and
3) giving states the option to provide HCBS waiver services to prevent, delay, or decrease the likelihood of institutionalized care."

From the Capitol Insider, Volume 14, Issue 22, June 8, 2009
Disability Collaboration: A Partnership of The Arc & United Cerebral Palsy
To sign up for the Capitol Insider

Open Congress tracking on HR 2688


Other blog posts on HR 2688,

HR2688, To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to improve ...
HR 2688 would amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to improve the State plan amendment option for providing home and community-based services under the Medicaid Program....

June 02, 2009 H.R. 2688: To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to ...
A bill inthe US Congress: To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to improve the State plan amendment option for providing home and community-based services under the Medicaid Program, and for other purposes.

Other resources:

---------
Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG and SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website,

Thursday, June 4, 2009

NEWS: Committee challenges HHS request for disease-specific funding

Committee challenges HHS request for disease-specific funding

By REBECCA NEAL
FederalTimes.com
June 03, 2009
"The chairman of the House Appropriations Committee is challenging the Obama administration’s 2010 budget request that funding be directed to cancer and autism research.
The committee won’t support what amounts to an earmark and opens science up for political debate, Chairman David Obey told Health and Human Services Department Secretary Kathleen Sebelius on Tuesday [June 2, 2009]..."
FULL ARTICLE

---------
Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG and SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website,

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

NEWS: Federal H.R. 2531 Mental Health in the Schools Act of 2009 introduced

Story from the Bazelon Center, with links added.

See the previous post on this bill and The Judge David L. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, aka, the Bazelon Center

Mental Health in the Schools Act

Representative Grace Napolitano (D-CA) and Tim Murphy (R-PA) [on May 20, 2009] re-introduced the Mental Health in the Schools Act of 2009 (H.R. 2531) to expand school-based mental health services for children in K-12. The two co-chairs of the Congressional Mental Health Caucus, in their “Dear Colleague” letter on the bill, highlighted how the bill would expand essential services.
It:
  • Revises, increases funding for, and expands the scope of the Safe Schools-Healthy Students program to provide access to more comprehensive school-based mental health services and supports;
  • Authorizes competitive grants to local school districts to assist them in implementing effective mental health programs for students (K-12), administered by state licensed or certified mental health professionals
  • Provides for comprehensive, culturally and linguistically appropriate, staff development for school and community service personnel working in the school to identify and support students in need of immediate mental health care and those at-risk for behavioral mental health disorders, allowing teachers to concentrate on teaching;
  • Promotes positive mental health education and support for parents, siblings, and other family members of children with mental health disorders, as well as concerned members of the community;
  • Requires schools to thoroughly document measures of outcome and demonstrate the actions they are taking to continue sustaining the program independently of grant funds.
Most recently, on May 7, Reps. Napolitano and Murphy shared remarks on the bill, alongside actress Goldie Hawn, at a legislative briefing on school mental health services sponsored by the Bazelon Center, NAMI, Mental Health America and the National Federation of Families for Children’s Mental Health (see http://www.bazelon. org/issues/ children/ positive_ behavioral_ support.htm).
The bill has been referred to the House Energy and Commerce Committee.
For more information visit: http://www.bazelon.org

Fair Use Policy
"Please feel free to forward our alerts as long as you credit the Bazelon Center with a link to our website: http://www.bazelon.org "

----------
Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG and SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website,

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

NEWS: Federal bill HR 2597: Positive Behavior for Safe and Effective Schools Act of 2009 introduced

From the June 1, 2009 edition of the Association of University Centers on Disabilities (AUCD)

Legislative News in Brief:,with annotation and links added.

Positive Behavior Supports

Rep. Phil Hare [on 5/21/09] introduced the
Positive Behavior for Safe and Effective Schools Act of 2009 (H.R. 2597).

The bill makes modest amendments to the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to foster the use of school wide positive behavior supports (SWPBS) in schools across the country. It also supports training of teachers, provides for technical assistance, research and related school reform activities that help improve the overall school environment.

Additionally, the legislation would establish a new office within the Department of Education that would help coordinate and administer activities assisting specialized instructional support personnel who provide a critical role in the link between social and academic outcomes for students. AUCD signed onto a coalition letter to Rep. Hare in support of the bill. It is hoped that the issue of improper use of restraints and seclusion in schools brought to light in a recent hearing and through a GAO report, will provide the impetus to help move this bill quickly.

-----------
Website: Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG and SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website, http://www.abainternational.org

Monday, June 1, 2009

NEWS: Huffington Post article on the Autism Treatment Acceleration Act: U.S. S.819 & H.R. 2413

The Autism Treatment Acceleration Act and the Autism Sandbox
Shelley Hendrix Reynolds
Posted: May 31, 2009 06:40 PM
Huffington Post

Please read the full article, but I want to highlight some cogent clauses made by Ms. Reynolds,

"...Despite dutifully paying premiums to insure against the unthinkable that their child could be diagnosed with a disease or disorder, most parents of children with autism cannot get appropriate coverage to treat their child's medical conditions. Not because these parents didn't act responsibly and do their part but because insurance did not do their part...

Why should you care about their plight as an average tax paying citizen without a child with autism? It directly affects your own checking account...

No one would dream of treating a child with a life threatening illness at any less than what the doctor recommends. No one would ever expect that the public education system to be responsible for curing that disease and yet, insurance companies do just that...shirk their accountability to the education system instead of providing children with appropriate coverage when they are toddlers making them more likely to be mainstreamed into a regular education setting. Providing access to these treatments saves tax payer's dollars, creates new job markets and most importantly, gives these children an opportunity to become tax payers themselves one day with independent lives via a fiscally responsible solution to a growing societal issue..."
See the full article at the Huffington Post

and for more information and TO ACT on the Autism Treatment Acceleration Act(s), see Autismvotes.

----------
Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG and SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website,