Showing posts with label public policy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label public policy. Show all posts

Sunday, January 31, 2010

NEWS: California - District Court decision revives Arce v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.

Prefacing note: While this report is being shared as a "news item of interest" as a public event in progress, it seems relevant at this time to state that this report is not taking an editorial position on the legal aspects or allegations of this case nor the specific claimants, nor does this constitute legal interpretation. Please see the court documents for relevant specifics.

On Wednesday, January 27, 2010, a decision authored by Justice Laurie D. Zelon of the Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven was handed down in California reversing a lower court ruling, and remanding to trial court with directions; this decision allows a previously filed suit to proceed to trial. The suit filed by Arce alleges that an insurer improperly denied applied behavior analysis and speech services as categorical practice and that such denial on the specified basis constitutes violation of California's Mental Health Parity law (AB88: Insurance Code §§10144.5   & Health and Safety Code§1374.72 ). Another aspect of the case in question is the provision of service by providers that are not licensed or state certified. The case in question is ARCE v. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC.

-----------------------------
For more information
2nd Appelate District
updated 1/31/2010 05:05PM
Case information - Arce et al. v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. et al.

Decision transcript
From Leagle, inc.
ARCE v. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC.
ANDREW ARCE, a Minor, etc. et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.
B215861.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.
Filed January 27, 2010.



CALIFORNIA LAW
Mental Health Parity aka AB 88,
Insurance Code §§10144.5   & Health and Safety Code§1374.72

Other  articles and reports related to ARCE v. KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN, INC. and regulation of ABA coverage
C.A. Revives UCL Action Against Kaiser Over Autism Services
By KENNETH OFGANG, Staff Writer
Metropolitan News-Enterprise
Thursday, January 28, 2010


Appeals court allows Arce vs. Kaiser autism class action to proceed
January 30th, 2010 at 1:48 pm
State Regulators Might Require Health Plans To Cover Autism Therapy
Monday, November 16, 2009
California Healthline


Letter dated 2/24/2009 from Consumer Watchdog to Cindy Ehnes, Director ,California Department of Managed Health Care

Applied Behavior Analysis — the Los Angeles lawsuit
Sam Miller, The Orange County Register
August 15th, 2008, 8:11 am


---------------------------------
ABA chapters in/for California
CalABA
Public Policy and Practice page

-----------
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG or SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website, http://www.abainternational.org

Friday, January 29, 2010

ANNOUNCE & REQUEST FOR COMMENT: Obama Administration issues rules requiring parity in treatment of mental, substance use disorders

**2/3/10 9:50 AM PST -Update to reflect current location of the interim final rules - prior link no longer valid**

Today the U.S. Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Treasury issued the awaited interim final rules [http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-2167.pdf http://www.federalregister.gov/OFRupload/OFRData/2010-02167_PI.pdf ] resulting from passage of the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA). The notice/press release below outlines changes resulting from the passage of MHPAEA, and requests comment during a comment period of 90 days on certain areas of the interim final rules. While the notice/press release is retained in full, some areas have been highlighted and bulleted to emphasize important areas of the law's requirements, areas that comment are being requested for, how to submit comments on the MHPEA interim rules, and how to request materials in an alternative accessible format.
----------------------------------------

Paul Wellstone, Pete Domenici Parity Act prohibits discrimination

WASHINGTON, Jan. 29 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The U.S. Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Treasury today jointly issued new rules providing parity for consumers enrolled in group health plans who need treatment for mental health or substance use disorders.
"Today's rules will bring needed relief to families faced with meeting the cost of obtaining mental health and substance abuse services," said U.S. Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis. "The benefits will give these Americans access to greatly needed medical treatment, which will better allow them to participate fully in society. That is not just sound policy, it's the right thing to do."

"The rules we are issuing today will, for the first time, help assure that those diagnosed with these debilitating and sometimes life-threatening disorders will not suffer needless or arbitrary limits on their care," said Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius.  "I applaud the longstanding and bipartisan effort that made these important new protections possible."

"Workers covered by group health plans who need mental health and substance abuse care deserve fair treatment," said Deputy Treasury Secretary Neal Wolin. "These rules expand on existing protections to ensure that people don't face unnecessary barriers to the treatment they need."
The new rules prohibit group health insurance plans — typically offered by employers — from restricting access to care by limiting benefits and requiring higher patient costs than those that apply to general medical or surgical benefits. The rules implement the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 (MHPAEA).

MHPAEA greatly expands on an earlier law, the Mental Health Parity Act of 1996, which required parity only in aggregate lifetime and annual dollar limits between the categories of benefits and did not extend to substance use disorder benefits. 

The new law requires that 
  • any group health plan that includes mental health and substance use disorder benefits along with standard medical and surgical coverage must treat them equally in terms of out-of-pocket costs, benefit limits and practices such as prior authorization and utilization review.  
  • These practices must be based on the same level of scientific evidence used by the insurer for medical and surgical benefits.  
    • For example, a plan may not apply separate deductibles for treatment related to mental health or substance use disorders and medical or surgical benefits.  They must be calculated as one limit. 
  • MHPAEA applies to employers with 50 or more workers whose group health plans choose to offer mental health or substance use disorder benefits 
  • The new rules are effective for plan years beginning on or after July 1, 2010.
The Wellstone-Domenici Act is named for two dominant figures in the quest for equal treatment of benefits.   The late Sen. Paul Wellstone, D-Minn., who was a vocal advocate for parity throughout his Senate career, sponsored the ultimately successful full parity act.  He was joined by former Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., who first introduced legislation to require parity in 1992.  Champions of the legislation also included the bipartisan team of Rep. Patrick Kennedy, D-R.I., and former Rep. Jim Ramstad, R-Minn.

The issue of parity dates back more than 40 years to President John F. Kennedy, and also was supported by President Clinton and the late Sen. Edward Kennedy.

The interim final rules released today were developed based on the departments' review of more than 400 public comments on how the parity rule should be written.   
Comments on the interim final rules are still being solicited. 
  • Sections where further comments are being specifically sought include so-called "non quantitative" treatment limits such as those that pertain to the 
    • scope and duration of covered benefits, 
    • how covered drugs are determined (formularies) and 
    • the coverage of step-therapies.  
  • Comments are also being specifically requested on the regulation's section on "scope of benefits" or continuum of care.
Comments on the interim final regulation are due 90 days after the publication date.
Comments may be emailed to the federal rulemaking portal at http://www.regulations.gov.
**1/29/10, 1:33pm PST - notice at regulations.gov
"Regulations.gov will undergo a scheduled maintenance outage and will be unavailable from Saturday, January 30, 2010, 8:00 a.m. to Saturday, January 30, 2010, 11:00 a.m. (EST). Thank you for your patience and we regret any inconvenience this outage may cause."**
  • Comments directed to HHS should include the file code CMS-4140-IFC.  
  • Comments to the Department of Labor should be identified by RIN 1210-AB30.  
  • Comments to the Treasury's Internal Revenue Service should be identified by REG-120692-09.  
  • Comments may be sent to any of the three departments and will be shared with the other departments 
    • Please do not submit duplicates.
U.S. Department of Labor releases are accessible on the Internet at http://www.dol.govThe information in this news release will be made available in alternate format (large print, Braille, audio tape or disc) from the COAST office upon request.  Please specify which news release when placing your request at 202-693-7828 or TTY 202-693-7755.  The Labor Department is committed to providing America's employers and employees with easy access to understandable information on how to comply with its laws and regulations.  For more information, please visit http://www.dol.gov/compliance.

SOURCE U.S. Department of Labor

RELATED LINKS
http://www.dol.gov
------------------------------------
For more information:

Federal Register: Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Part IV:
Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, 26 CFR Part 54
Department of Labor, Employee Benefits Security Administration, 29 CFR Part 2590
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 45 CFR Part 146
Interim Final Rules Under the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008; Final Rule
http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-2167.pdf

Good summary article of the rules release, application and comment submission
Registration required to access.
Interim rule issued on mental health parity
ModernHealthcare.com
By Jessica Zigmond
Posted: January 29, 2010 - 5:59 am ET


Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG or SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website, http://www.abainternational.org

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

OPPORTUNITY: 2010 Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr. Foundation Public Policy Fellowships

The Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr. Foundation Public Policy Fellowship Program 2010-2011
The Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr. Foundation is seeking exemplary professionals and/or family members of persons with intellectual or developmental disabilities who are currently working or volunteering in the field of inclusive services and supports for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities for an intensive one-year Public Policy Fellowship in Washington, D.C. The purpose of the Fellowship is to prepare both early career and veteran leaders to assume leadership in the public policy arena in their home state and/or nationally. During this one year Fellowship, the successful applicant will learn how federal legislation is initiated, developed, and passed by the Congress, as well as how programs are administered and regulations promulgated by federal agencies.
The application deadline for 2010-2011 is March 5, 2010 by 5:00 P.M. EST
The Fellowship starting date will be negotiated with the successful applicant. The Foundation anticipates up to three fellowships will be awarded for the period July, 2010-June 30, 2011

FULL INFORMATION on application for the Public Policy Fellowship program

The Joseph P. Kennedy Jr. Foundation
----------

-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG or SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website, http://www.abainternational.org

Friday, December 18, 2009

NEWS: From the December Organization for Autism Research (OAR) Newsletter

About OAR,
"The Organization for Autism Research (OAR) was created in December 2001–the product of the shared vision and unique life experiences of OAR’s seven founders. Led by these parents and grandparents of children and adults on the autism spectrum, OAR set out to use applied science to answer questions that parents, families, individuals with autism, teachers and caregivers confront daily. No other autism organization has this singular focus."
"OAR’s Scientific Council is comprised of 14 leading autism and medical professionals [including Behavior Analysts] serving as an expert information resource for all OAR matters concerning issues of research.  In that regard, the Council assists OAR’s Board of Directors in developing its research strategy, near term priorities, and long-range research objectives.  The Council also provides program guidance and oversight for OAR´s research competition and plays a central role in ensuring the highest quality reviews for prospective OAR research proposals."

Some headlines from this month's December 2009 OARacle

More than 1,000 People Meet to Advance the Future of Adults with Autism

"On November 13, 2009, the Advancing Futures for Adults with Autism (AFAA) National Town Hall was held with the support and participation of OAR. For this, the first such meeting of its kind, more than 1,000 family members, professionals, adults on the spectrum, and community members gathered simultaneously, via live webcast, at 15 satellite locations across the country, as well as through an online virtual site...While many priorities were uncovered through the process, several rose to the top:
  • In cross-cutting strategies, many felt it was essential to change funding streams so that financial assistance follows the person. In addition, accessibility to necessary supports should be ensured, and the availability of qualified and motivated personnel should be increased.
  • Two housing strategies that met with overall approval were to support person-centered service models and expand both public and private funding for residential services.
  • Regarding employment of individuals, attendees throughout the country felt the need for support, both during school years in the form of vocational skills training and through adulthood in the form of employment supports.
  • When discussing community-life strategies, nearly all agreed that one priority is essential--the need for first responders to be educated about the behaviors that might arise when encountering individuals with autism in emergency/first-response situations.
A preliminary report, distributed to attendees that day, summarized the day’s activities, including conclusions drawn and demographic information..."
FULL STORY


OAR President Presents to Autism Speaks’ Scientific Advisory Committee
"...On November 5, OAR President Peter Gerhardt, Ed.D., along with Marsha Mailick Seltzer, Ph.D., met with the Autism Speaks Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) to discuss the needs of adolescents and adults with autism at the SAC’s annual meeting held on the campus of the University of North Carolina...Dr. Gerhardt spoke about some of the factors that may impact effective transition in practice. Stressing that the poor outcome data are more a function of a significant systems failure than an actual failure of people with autism, Dr. Gerhardt noted that if transition planning is to be effective (at any age), it must incorporate intensive community–based instruction, direct attention to skills subsumed under the heading of adaptive behavior, and result in a significant degree of inclusion in the community where the person with autism lives..."
FULL STORY

-----------
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG or SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website, http://www.abainternational.org

Thursday, December 17, 2009

S. 2860 bill on restraint and seclusion joins HR 4247 & Wrightslaw sums up this legislation

Wrightslaw has put together an info page on the recently submitted Federal bills on restraint and seclusion in schools,
H.R.4247 (Miller, McMorris Rodgers + 7 co-sponsors)  and now S. 2860 (Dodd).

Preventing Harmful Restraint and Seclusion in Schools Act (H.R. 4247)
  • Preventing Harmful Restraint and Seclusion in Schools Act: What Does it Mean for Children with Disabilities?
  • IEPs, BIPs, and Educational Plans
  • National Reports on Restraint and Seclusion 
 The text of this legislation is now available at Thomas.gov, and both bills have been assigned to Committees

House bill,
H.R.4247 : To prevent and reduce the use of physical restraint and seclusion in schools, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep Miller, George [CA-7] (introduced 12/9/2009)      Cosponsors (7)
Committees: House Education and Labor
Latest Major Action: 12/9/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Labor.

Senate bill,
S.2860 : A bill to protect students from inappropriate seclusion and physical restraint, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Sen Dodd, Christopher J. [CT] (introduced 12/9/2009)      Cosponsors (None)
Committees: Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Latest Major Action: 12/9/2009 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

There is a great deal of public support and attention by advocates to this legislation, which has received widespread visibility due to issued reports and the Congressional public hearing of the past year. It is anticipated that both bills will be given attention early in 2010.

Previous blogposts

Wednesday, December 9, 2009
NEWS: H.R. 4247 - The Preventing Harmful Restraint and Seclusion in Schools Act

Tuesday, December 8, 2009
NEWS: December 9 Introduction of Federal Bill on School Restraint and Seclusion

Tuesday, June 2, 2009
NEWS: Comments by Education Secretary Arne Duncan on the use of restraint & seclusion in public schools 

Tuesday, May 19, 2009
NEWSFLASH: GAO Report and House Committee hearing on Seclusion and Restraint in Public and Private Schools 

-----------
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG or SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website, http://www.abainternational.org

Wednesday, December 9, 2009

NEWS: H.R. 4247 - The Preventing Harmful Restraint and Seclusion in Schools Act

 **Updated 12/25/09 to add video from the 112/9/09 press conference**

Earlier today during a press conference, U.S. House Representatives George Miller D- 7th district, CA,  and Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-5th district,WA, unveiled,

The Preventing Harmful Restraint and Seclusion in Schools Act 
H.R. 4247: To prevent and reduce the use of physical restraint and seclusion in schools, and for other purposes



Representative George Miller (CA), Chair of the House Committee on Education and Labor, and co-sponsor of H.R. 4247 - Preventing Harmful Restraint and Seclusion in the Schools Act


This bill would establish the first federal standards to protect students from misuse of restraint and seclusion and ensure the safety of everyone in the classroom. It would apply to public schools, private schools and preschools receiving federal education support.

Specifically H.R. 4247 would:
  • Establish important minimum federal safety standards in schools, similar to the protections already in place in hospitals and other non-medical community based facilities
  • Limit physical restraint and locked seclusion, allowing these interventions only when there is imminent danger of injury, and only when imposed by trained staff;
  • Outlaw mechanical restraints, such as strapping kids to chairs, and prohibit restraints that restrict breathing;
  • Require schools to notify parents after incidents when restraint or seclusion was used;
  • Call on states, within two years of enactment, to establish their own policies, procedures, monitoring and enforcement systems to meet these minimum standards;
  • Encourage states to provide support and training to better protect students and prevent the need for emergency behavioral interventions; and 
  • Increase transparency, oversight and enforcement tools to prevent future abuse.
The Education and Labor Committee plans to mark up the bill early next year.

Excellent Fact Sheets and descriptions are provided at the U.S. House Committee on Education and Labor's website on provisions in The Preventing Harmful Restraint and Seclusion in Schools Act (H.R. 4247) including,

FACT SHEET: Preventing Harmful Restraint and Seclusion in the Schools Act
on December 9, 2009 11:30 AM  Kittredge, Betsy Miller
Protecting All Children in School
also,

Definitions of Terms Used in the Preventing Harmful Restraint and Seclusion in the Schools Act




Curt Decker Executive Director of the National Disabilities Network





Mike Resnick Associate Executive Director of the National School Board Association





Nicole Danhof-Holden and Alan Holden, parents Muskegon, MI


-----------------------------------

Other references and past blog posts

Autism Speaks endorses H.R. 4247

TODAY: Bipartisan Lawmakers to Introduce Legislation to Protect All Children in Schools from Abuse
December 9, 2009 9:08 AM
House Committee on Education and Labor blog

Preventing Harmful Restraint and Seclusion in the Schools Act
December 9, 2009 11:30 AM
House Committee on Education and Labor blog

NEWS: December 9 Introduction of Federal Bill on School Restraint and Seclusion
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG blog

Lawmakers Unveil Restraint And Seclusion Bill To End ‘Nightmare Of Abuse’
Michelle Diament
Disability Scoop, December 9, 2009

Bill aims to protect students from abuse in schools
Patricia E. Bauer, December 9th, 2009

Lawmakers Seek Halt To Abuses Of Disabled Kids In School
National Public Radio Health Blog, December 9, 2009


-----------
Website: Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG and SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website, http://www.abainternational.org

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

NEWS: Illinois Budget Woes Threaten SIU Autism Program

This newsstory just came in and it sounds like really bad news for children on the autism spectrum in Illinois, and for behavior analysts because of the potential loss of a training program. Alums of the SIU program may want to keep close tabs on what is happening and throw their support behind trying to get a fair budget passed and keeping programs such as the SIU Autism Center open.

Gov. Quinn to speak at university's endangered autism center
Center for Autistic Spectrum Disorders threatened by lack of income tax hike
Barton Lorimor
The Daily Egyptian
Published: Wednesday, June 17, 2009


Former students and coordinators of the university’s [Southern Illinois University] Center for Autism Spectrum Disorders plan to present their case for continued state funding to Gov. Patrick Quinn Thursday [June 18, 2009] during his campus visit.

Quinn will meet with the center’s staff and take a tour of the facility, which provides therapy to children with autism and trains students in effective ways to treat the disease, said Anthony Cuvo, the center’s director.

Cuvo said the center’s state funding, roughly $492,000 per fiscal year, would be cut off if Quinn approves a state budget without the proposed 50 percent income tax hike . Such a cut would mean the center, which has trained nearly 200 graduate students studying behavior analysis and therapy, would not have any money to operate on, he said

Legislators failed to pass Quinn’s income tax proposal, which would have increased the 3 percent tax on incomes of at least $60,000 a year to 4.5 percent, but did not replace it with another revenue source to pay for state programs and begin decreasing a roughly $12 billion deficit. Though legislative leaders say they expect to make revisions to the budget later, the plan on Quinn’s desk cuts the Department of Human Services by $2.2 billion.

The Autism Program, a branch of the Department of Human Services that funds the center along with 11 other autism treatment centers across the state, would no longer receive state dollars unless the tax hike were approved, Georgia Winson, chief of the program, said in a news release.

FULL ARTICLE
------------------------
Past newsstories about the SIU Autism Center
  • Autism center offers help, hope
    Feb 23, 2005 ... The center offers diagnostic, intervention and consultation services for children with autism spectrum disorders and their families, ...

---------
Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG or individual SIG member authors and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed
to their website,

Friday, June 12, 2009

FYI/ARTICLE: Future of Psychiatry In the Year 2019: Psychiatry in Law and Public Policy

[Passed along by Joe Cautilli, Chair of the Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis Special Interest Group.]

-------------------------
June 3, 2009
Michael A. Norko, MD. Future of Psychiatry In the Year 2019: Psychiatry in Law and Public Policy, Psychiatric Times, 26(6).

"Whether you credit the idea to Niels Bohr or Yogi Berra, it is true that predictions are very difficult to make, especially about the future. It is a daunting task, yet obviously an intriguing one, to try to imagine what our field will be like in 10 years or more.

To cope with the limits of prognostication, article size, and personal knowledge (and to limit the extent of how wrong I may be proved by time), I will focus here on events in the realms of ethics and law in psychiatry and the inevitable conflicts between science and public policy and economics that have their origin in those spawning grounds. I will comment on 2 general areas:


• Conflicts related to people our society fears and feels justified in stigmatizing—including sex offenders and people with serious mental illness


• The limits of the sciences of prediction and the ways in which our fears lead us to ignore those limits..."


FULL ARTICLE

---------
Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG or individual SIG member authors and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed
to their website,

FYI: From the OMB: "Building Rigorous Evidence to Drive Policy"

Building Rigorous Evidence to Drive Policy
Monday, June 8th.
Peter R. Orszag, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director

The article emphasizes a need for more evaluation of Federal systems and Federally funded programs to determine what is "working", to gather evidence, and to introduce innovation and changes into that which is not. It also describes some new Federal pilot programs.

From the full article,
"...At one level, we need to invest more in program evaluation — and the President’s Budget does. For example, we call for an expansion of the Institute for Education Sciences and growth in the evaluation budgets at the Department of Labor and the Corporation for National and Community Service . We’re working with YouthBuild, a program the President supports, to implement its first-ever rigorous national evaluation.

Beyond investing more in evaluations, we are also designing new initiatives with evaluation standards built into their DNA. One example is the Department of Education’s "Grow What Works and Innovation Fund."..."

---------
Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG or individual SIG member authors and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed
to their website,

Monday, June 1, 2009

NEWS: Huffington Post article on the Autism Treatment Acceleration Act: U.S. S.819 & H.R. 2413

The Autism Treatment Acceleration Act and the Autism Sandbox
Shelley Hendrix Reynolds
Posted: May 31, 2009 06:40 PM
Huffington Post

Please read the full article, but I want to highlight some cogent clauses made by Ms. Reynolds,

"...Despite dutifully paying premiums to insure against the unthinkable that their child could be diagnosed with a disease or disorder, most parents of children with autism cannot get appropriate coverage to treat their child's medical conditions. Not because these parents didn't act responsibly and do their part but because insurance did not do their part...

Why should you care about their plight as an average tax paying citizen without a child with autism? It directly affects your own checking account...

No one would dream of treating a child with a life threatening illness at any less than what the doctor recommends. No one would ever expect that the public education system to be responsible for curing that disease and yet, insurance companies do just that...shirk their accountability to the education system instead of providing children with appropriate coverage when they are toddlers making them more likely to be mainstreamed into a regular education setting. Providing access to these treatments saves tax payer's dollars, creates new job markets and most importantly, gives these children an opportunity to become tax payers themselves one day with independent lives via a fiscally responsible solution to a growing societal issue..."
See the full article at the Huffington Post

and for more information and TO ACT on the Autism Treatment Acceleration Act(s), see Autismvotes.

----------
Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG and SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website,

FYI: The Bazelon Center Mental Health Policy Reporter

The Judge David L. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, aka, the Bazelon Center, does a good job of tracking and advocating on matters related to mental health policy. Below is information on the most recent issue of their policy newsletter. You can sign up for your own subscription at the Bazelon Center website: http://www.bazelon.org

FYI: latest issue of the Bazelon Center Mental Health Policy Reporter

(see online or sign-up for your own email subscription)
Volume VIII, No. 4, May 27, 2009

Schools and Mental Health Lead Legislative Agenda

Focus on Supreme Court Nomination Dominates News

Articles:

Newsbytes

  • HHS Makes $75 Million Available to States to Expand Health Insurance Coverage
  • Congressional Briefing n People with Serious Mental Illnesses in Jails
http://bazelon.org
----------
Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG and SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website,

Sunday, May 31, 2009

ACTION Federal: The Autism Treatment Acceleration Act(s) of 2009

Recently, Autismvotes put out a shout out for action on the U.S. Senate and House versions of the Autism Treatment Acceleration Acts of 2009 (See below for status of the Resolutions and the text), and this is a reminder to any interested that to progress this Congressional session, these (and any other bills of interest) need phone calls, emails, and, if it can be done, visits to state delegations either in D.C., or in the district offices. Both resolutions allow expansion of ERISA, allow for evidenced treatments for autism, including behavior analytic, and support grants and pilot programs for coordination and expansion of transition and adult services.

Some "how to kits" for advocacy, which can be used for any policy issue or legislative matter:

Legistlative Advocacy Handbook from the ABA-I Governmental Affairs Committee

Legistlative Advocacy PowerPoint from the ABA-I Governmental Affairs Committee

And a resource not produced by ABA-I, but another good general guide to advocating at the Federal level,
A Psychologists Guide to Participation in Federal Advocacy Process; Abridged version.
The original text for this guide was written by Barbara J. Calkins and revised by the APA Public Policy Office in 1995.
[This is a pretty general run-down on the legislative process and how to advocate, so much of the information can be applicable to anyone and not just Psychologists]

About the Resolutions, from thomas.gov

[111st] S.819 : A bill to provide for enhanced treatment, support, services, and research for individuals with autism spectrum disorders and their families.
Sponsor: Sen Durbin, Richard [IL] (introduced 4/2/2009) Cosponsors (10)
Committees: Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions
Latest Major Action: 4/2/2009 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

and

[111st] H.R.2413 : To provide for enhanced treatment, support, services, and research for individuals with autism spectrum disorders and their families.
Sponsor: Rep Doyle, Michael F. [PA-14] (introduced 5/14/2009) Cosponsors (3)
Committees: House Energy and Commerce; House Education and Labor; House Oversight and Government Reform; House Armed Services
Latest Major Action: 5/14/2009 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Labor, Oversight and Government Reform, and Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

Please see this page at Autismvotes to see summaries and bullet points on the legislation.

Thanks for taking action.

-----------
Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG and SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website,

Thursday, May 28, 2009

FYI: Advancing Futures for Adults with Autism — AFAA Initiative

Advancing Futures for Adults with Autism — AFAA Initiative

Events

November 13, 2009 - National Town Hall Meeting
The National Town Hall will be hosted by The Autism Program Service Network (“TAP”) in Chicago, with participants joining the national discussion via webcasts from at least 14 national satellite sites.
2010 Washington D.C. , Autism Congress
The Autism Congress will build a consensus statement outlining the existing challenges and providing cost effective, evidence-based solutions. This statement will serve as a national agenda from which an action plan will be devised. Participants will include individuals with autism, autism advocates, policy experts, elected public officials, public policy experts and university professors/researchers.

Among familiar groups participating, Autismspeaks, Easter Seals, the Organization for Autism Research (OAR), SARRC, and others.

They are also looking for other organizations to participate in the AFAA

For more information,
http://www.afaa-us.org/

-----------
Website: Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG and SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website,

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

NEWSFLASH: GAO Report and House Committee hearing on Seclusion and Restraint in Public and Private Schools

On Tuesday May 19, 2009, the U.S. House Committee on Education and Labor held a hearing of the full Committee on,

Examining the Abusive and Deadly Use of Seclusion and Restraint in Schools
Full Committee Hearing 10:00 AM, May 19, 2009
2175 Rayburn H.O.B., Washington, DC
"On Tuesday, May 19, the House Committee on Education and Labor will hold a hearing to examine abusive and deadly uses of seclusion and restraint in U.S. schools....
Part of the testimony submitted was the investigative GAO report,
Seclusions and Restraints: Selected Cases of Death and Abuse at Public and Private Schools and Treatment Centers
GAO-09-719T, May 19, 2009
On a personal note, having listened to the testimony from Mr. Kurz of the GAO and that of parents and other experts, the situation was quite shocking--and was expressed so by the Committee members who demonstrated both anger and a sense of urgency to address the abuses to minors identified in the testimony. This included withholding of food, water and toileting due to extended seclusion instituted sometimes for trivial reasons or behaviors triggered by adult behavior, suffocation by use of prone restraint (one case given in testimony was referred to as "murder" by a Committee member), physical abuse, taping and strapping children to such as Rifton chairs . Often parents were not notified but discovered the abuse via bruises, or behavior change in their children. Many times school personnel who would have liked to either intervene or notify the parents were unable to do so because of retaliation within districts for such notification. An issue that particularly interested the Committee was that often educational personnel determined as probably culpable, in one case including the death of a student, were allowed to retain their teaching certification and would be transferred to another teaching situation or resume his/her career in another state (sometimes resuming the abuse of students as well). A Committee member referred to this treatment of children with disabilities in public schools as "like Willowbrook" (the notorious Staten Island institution that triggered the move to take children out of closed institutions).

Unlike other situations, parents were unable to enlist the assistance of such as Child Protective Services since schools are not in CPS jurisdiction, and unable to receive satisfaction or assistance through districts themselves or law enforcement were compelled to bring civil suit in order to change circumstances for their own child or for the overall good.

Some of the discussion for solutions turned on expansion of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) (which was termed by almost all in the hearing as a solution "that works") to a national level , potential of a Federal registry for those convicted of abuse or death through inappropriate application of restraint or seclusion (similar to the system used for convicted sex offenders), banning of use of prone restraint, states coordination and uniform standards of application (currently only 7 states require training in use of restraint and 19 states have no defined standards for use of restraint or seclusion).

CNN News story May 18, 2009
GAO report: Special-needs kids abused in schools
From Abbie Boudreau and Steve Turnham
CNN Special Investigations Unit
(CNN) -- Congressional auditors have uncovered widespread abuse of techniques use to restrain or discipline special-education students in U.S. schools, with some deaths linked to the practices, a top congressman says.

The findings are among those expected from a Government Accountability Office report scheduled to be released Tuesday. The report documented serious problems with the way children with disabilities are being treated in public schools, including cases of children being held face-down on the ground..."
Restraint can dispirit and hurt special-ed students
USA today
"...A new report from the Government Accountability Office, Congress' investigative arm, also out today, finds "widespread" allegations of abuse involving the practices in schools — even when students aren't physically aggressive or dangerous to themselves or others..."
---------------------
References:
Seclusions and Restraints:
Selected Cases of Death and Abuse at Public and Private Schools and Treatment Centers
GAO-09-719T, May 19, 2009

School is Not Supposed to Hurt: Investigative Report on Abusive
Restraint and Seclusion in Schools

National Disability Rights Network, January 2009

Map of State law or regulation on restraint and seclusion

The lethal hazard of prone restraint: Positional asphyxiation.
PROTECTION & ADVOCACY, INC.
INVESTIGATIONS UNIT
433 HEGENBERGER ROAD, SUITE 220
OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA 94621
TELEPHONE: (800)776-5746
April 2002
Publication #7018.01

Restraint & Seclusion in California Schools: A Failing Grade
Protection & Advocacy, Inc.
Investigations Unit
1330 Broadway, Suite 500
Oakland, CA 94612
June 2007

-----------
Website: Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG and SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website, http://www.abainternational.org

Thursday, May 7, 2009

FED. LEGISLATION: S.819 - Autism Treatment Acceleration Act of 2009



Autism Treatment Acceleration Act TV Coverage

Senator Dick Durbin (IL) visits The Autism Program of Illinois (TAP)
to announce his introduction of the
Autism Treatment Acceleration Act of 2009.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCxcnzdTlC8

-----------
Website: Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG and SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website, http://www.abainternational.org

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

ABA-I NEWSFLASH & ACTION: From the GAC, "ABAI Legislative Agenda"

Received 5/5/09 on the behavioranalysisandpublicpolicy yahoogroup

To: ABAI State Affiliate Chapters Governmental Affairs Representatives
Members of the ABAI PIBA SIG
From: Michael F. Dorsey, Ph.D., BCBA, Chair, Governmental Affairs Committee
Re: ABAI Legislative Agenda

I am writing to inform you of the newly established process adopted by the ABAI Practice Board to prepare a comprehensive agenda of critical bills for ABAI. The process, as described below, begins with the submission of bills recommended to be considered by members of ABAI as well as key constituents, to the Governmental Affairs Committee of the Practice Board. While bills may be submitted to the GAC at the annual meeting, it is my hope that you will forward copies of any bills you wish to have considered to our email address at abaipracticeboardgac@gmail.com in advance of the meeting so that the members of the GAC will have time to review the bills prior to the meeting.

The GAC will be meeting in a joint meeting with the ABAI PIBA SIG on Saturday, May 23, 2009 at 7:30 PM in North 224A. Please join us for this open meeting.


Governmental Affairs Committee
ABAI Practice Board
Legislative Review Process

1. The Governmental Affairs Committee will review and adopt, on an annual basis, bills presented to the Committee by the members of ABAI for the establishment of a Legislative agenda for ABAI, based on the following model:

1. A three tiered system that includes one “Priority Bill,” three to five “Supported Bills,” and an undefined number of “Endorsed Bills.”

2. At an annual open meeting of the Governmental affairs Committee, held during the ABAI Conference, the members of the Governmental affairs Committee will meet to review and discuss bills submitted by members or stake holders that fall within the scope of the profession of Applied Behavior Analysis and, if enacted, may either enhance or detract from ability to practice;
3. The Governmental Affairs Committee will identify a slate of such bills critical for the support of the practice of Applied Behavior Analysis and make recommendations relative to their support or opposition to the Practice Board.

i. The Priority Bill will be the center piece of the ABAI Legislative agenda. The Governmental affairs committee will notify the sponsoring agencies/legislators of the action taken in identifying the legislation as the Priority Bill for ABAI for the year. This will allow the use of the name of ABAI to be used in all correspondence, etc. related to this bill. Additionally members of the committee will be available to testify at hearings, submit written statements related to the bills, make phone contacts with appropriate legislators, and activate the phone/email alert system to prompt ABAI members to contact their legislators indicating the position of ABAI on this particular bill, etc.

ii. Three to five Supported Bills will be treated in a similar manner to the Priority Bill, with the exception that committee members will not be available to testify on behalf of the bill(s).

iii. An undetermined number of Endorsed Bills will be identified which the committee believes are important to the practice of Applied Behavior Analysis, but do not rise to the level of importance which justifies the expenditure of the time or resources focused on the Priority of Supported Bills. The single level of support for bills identified in this category will be to notify the sponsoring agencies/legislator s of the action taken in identifying the legislation as an Endorsed Bill for ABAI for the year. This will allow the use of the name of ABAI to be used in all correspondence, etc. related to this bill.


-----------
Website: Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG and SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website, http://www.abainternational.org

Monday, May 4, 2009

NEWS: The Disability Policy Collaboration and how to subscribe

FYI: The The Capitol Insider
Volume 14, Issue 16, May 4, 2009
Advocacy and policy updates from Disability Policy Collaboration,
a joint project of The Arc and United Cerebral Palsy

To activate your own subscription to The Capitol Insider

Action Alerts


Obama Administration

The Senate, by a vote of 65-31, confirmed Gov. Kathleen Sebelius (D-KS) as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
All of the members of President Obama's cabinet have now been confirmed and sworn-in.

Congress

Senator Arlen Specter (PA), a Republican of 28 years, announced he would switch his party affiliation and begin caucusing with the Democrats.
Majority Leader Reid (D-NV) has signaled that he doesn't intend to change existing committee membership and leadership, but Specter's move to the other side of the aisle may give Democrats an added majority in key committees: five more seats than Republicans on the Appropriations Committee, and a four-seat edge on Judiciary, Environment and Public Works, Veterans' Affairs and Special Aging. Democrats are now 1 vote away from the 60 votes needed to stop a filibuster, if they remain united, while they await the outcome of Minnesota's Senate seat. Meanwhile, Republicans will begin to contemplate who will replace Specter as Ranking Member of the Judiciary Committee.

Budget Resolution

As President Obama marked his first 100 days in office, Congress adopted a Fiscal Year 2010 Budget Resolution that sets the stage for action on his top legislative priorities.
The House adopted the conference report on the resolution by 233-193. No Republican voted for the budget; 17 Democrats - nearly all of them fiscal conservatives - voted against it. The Senate vote about six hours later was 53-43. Again, no Republicans voted for the budget, while three Democrats voted against it. The Budget Resolution (S Con Res 13) is non-binding, but it sets the framework for Congress to make legislative decisions on taxes, appropriations and entitlement programs later in the year. The $3.56 trillion budget resolution includes reconciliation instructions that would allow Obama's proposed health care overhaul to move through Congress immune from a Senate filibuster. The Budget Resolution has a cap on discretionary spending that is $10 billion less than the Administration's request. This is a strong indication that funding for domestic discretionary programs like education, employment, rehabilitation and housing will likely be tight.

Medicaid

The Department of Health and Human Services announced that the Bush Administration's school based administration/transportation and outpatient regulations have been rescinded, and that the targeted case management rule has been partially rescinded:
  • The school based administration/transportation rule eliminated Medicaid reimbursement for administrative costs such as those associated with enrolling school aged children in Medicaid. School administrators estimated that these cuts would have forced them to severely reduce related services (e.g. physical, occupational and speech and language therapies) and classroom aides provided to students with disabilities in special education.
  • The outpatient rule narrowed the scope of services that can be provided to poor people under Medicaid's outpatient hospital benefit, such as dental and vision care.
  • The targeted case management rule was required by the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA). The Bush Administration had issued a regulation that went far beyond the requirements of the DRA, including making it significantly more difficult for individuals transitioning from institutions to the community by reducing federal reimbursement for transitional case management from the last 180 days of an individual's institutional stay to the last 60 days. In many cases, due to the lack of affordable and accessible housing and challenges in securing support services, it is difficult to impossible to transition to the community in 60 days. The partial rescission removes all provisions that went beyond the requirements of the DRA.

These rescissions are a great victory for the The Arc and UCP.

The rehabilitative (or "rehab") services option rule is a proposed rule and cannot be implemented at this time. The disability community is urging HHS to formally withdraw it. The Rehab option rule would restrict the scope of eligible rehabilitation services and eliminated coverage for day habilitation services for individuals with developmental disabilities.

An official announcement will appear in the Federal Register on May 6 and can be accessed at:
http://www.federalregister.gov/OFRUpload/OFRData/2009-10494_PI.pdf

Health Reform

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-MT) and Ranking Member Charles Grassley (R-IA) released policy options for healthcare delivery reform entitled "Transforming the Health Care Delivery System: Proposals to Improve Patient Care and Reduce Health Care Costs."
It is anticipated that these proposals will form the basis of the delivery system component of the Finance Committee's health reform bill. The proposals include recommendations for:
* Reform - Improving Quality and Promoting Primary Care
* Payment Reform - Fostering Care Coordination and Provider Collaboration
* Health Care Infrastructure Investments - Tools to Support Delivery System Reform
* Medicare Advantage - Promoting Quality, Efficiency and Chronic Care Management
* Public Program Integrity - Combating Fraud, Waste and Abuse
See the report at:
http://finance.senate.gov/sitepages/leg/LEG%202009/042809%20Health%20Care%20Description%20of%20Policy%20Option.pdf

International Rights

At the 2009 Disability Policy Seminar, Kareem Dale, Special Assistant to the President for Disability Policy, confirmed that the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities was "important to the President and a priority of the President."
The President can make the U.S. a signatory of the Convention, but it takes an act of Congress to ratify the Convention. There are eight guiding principles that underlie the Convention and each one of its specific articles: 1) Respect for inherent dignity, individual autonomy including the freedom to make one's own choices, and independence of persons, 2) Non-discrimination, 3) Full and effective participation and inclusion in society, 4) Respect for difference and acceptance of persons with disabilities as part of human diversity and humanity, 5) Equality of opportunity, 6) Accessibility, 7) Equality between men and women, and 8) Respect for the evolving capacities of children with disabilities and respect for the right of children with disabilities to preserve their identities. For more information see:
http://www.un.org/disabilities/

Victimization

H.R. 1913, commonly referred to as the Hate Crimes bill, passed the House on April 29 by a vote of 234-190.
The day before, the Senate introduce the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009 (S. 909), sponsored by Senator Kennedy (D-MA). The Senate's companion bill currently has 35 cosponsors. This legislation, which has the support of President Obama, would expand the federal definition of hate crimes to include disability, gender, gender identity and sexual orientation. It would also provide federal grants to state and local agencies for hate crimes investigations, prosecution, and training for enforcement officers.

Disability Policy Seminar

The 2009 Disability Policy Seminar took place last week.
Five hundred and fifty persons participated from 48 states, plus the District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Puerto Rico, in addition to international participants from Norway and Canada. The event culminated in over 150 visits to Congressional offices to advocate for key disability programs and issues. See the program, Key issue fact sheets, and overhead presentations at:
http://www.thearc.org/NetCommunity/Page.aspx?pid=1709

Major Events Ahead

FY 2010 Budget

This Thursday, the President is expected to release the detailed budget request for FY 2010.
In February the Administration had released a budget request that included overall spending levels and priorities but not detailed line items for individual programs. The budget request includes the funding levels the Administration would like to see for individual programs within the federal government.

Employment

The Senate Health Education Labor and Pensions Committee will hold a hearing on the nomination of Seth Harris to be Deputy Secretary of Labor on May 7.
Harris was most recently the Obama Transition Project's Agency Working Group Leader for the labor, education, and transportation agencies. He is a Professor and the Director of Labor & Employment Law Programs at New York Law School. He was also a Senior Fellow of the United Cerebral Palsy's Life Without Limits Project.

Health Care Reform

On Tuesday the Senate Finance Committee will hold a Roundtable Discussion on "Expanding Health Care Coverage".
Next week Finance Committee members will meet in a closed Executive Session to develop policy options on the issues discussed at the Roundtable. A webcast of the Roundtable can be accessed at:
http://finance.senate.gov/sitepages/hearings.htm

On Wednesday the House Ways and Means Committee will hold a hearing titled, "'Health Reform in the 21st Century: A Conversation with Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius." See:
http://waysandmeans.house.gov/hearings.asp?formmode=detail&hearing=676

Health Care

On Wednesday the Senate Special Aging Committee will hold a hearing on "Medicare and Medicaid Fraud." See:
http://aging.senate.gov/

On Thursday the House Education and Labor Committee will hold a hearing titled, "Ensuring Preparedness Against the Flu Virus at School and Work." See:
http://edlabor.house.gov/hearings/2009/05/ensuring-preparedness-against.shtml

Employment

On Tuesday the House Education and Labor Committee will hold a hearing titled, "New Innovations and Best Practices under the Workforce Investment Act."
See:
http://edlabor.house.gov/hearings/2009/05/new-innovations-and-best-pract-2.shtml


Announcements

Swine Flu Information

The federal government and public health organizations have made available several resources on the H1N1 flu, also known as swine flu:


* The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) page containing the latest information about H1N1 Flu, including activities currently underway to deal with the situation, daily updates on affected areas and numbers of cases, and precautions you can take to protect yourself and your family: http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/. You may also contact the CDC at 800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) English/Spanish TTY: (888) 232-6348, 24 Hours/Ever Day -- cdcinfo@cdc.gov.

* An HHS report, Home Health Care During an Influenza Pandemic: Issues and Resources, based on the findings of an expert panel meeting, including representatives of home health care, emergency and disaster planning, professional organizations and federal and state government agencies:
http://www.pandemicflu.gov/plan/healthcare/homehealth.html

* A report published by Association for State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO), At Risk Populations and Pandemic Influenza: Planning Guidance for State, Territorial, Tribal, and Local Health Departments.
http://www.astho.org/pubs/State_local_review_Final.pdf

* Considering the Needs of Employees with Disabilities During a Pandemic Flu Outbreak at
http://www.jan.wvu.edu/media/employmentpandemicflufact.doc
Stimulus Reporting Requirements for Education

The Department of Education has provided a brief summary of Federal Agency and State's Reporting requirement for agencies distributing or receiving up to 100 billion in aid for education:
Federal agencies (including the Department of Education) must:
* Host their own recovery.gov web sites
* Report "major communications" such as press events
* Report weekly on stimulus funding obligations and outlays
* Report weekly on major actions
* Craft a formal plan on how the department will manage stimulus funds overall and detailed plans to be approved by the Office of Management and Budget by May 15.

States must:
* Submit quarterly reports, starting October 10, accounting for how funds were spent, the programs' programs, and the number of jobs created or saved.
* Submit annual reports on how the state fiscal stabilization money was used, how many jobs were saved or created, and how much progress was made in key education reform areas (such as reducing teacher quality inequities).

Social Security Benefits

Economic forecasts by the Obama Administration and the Congressional Budget Office show that Social Security recipients will not get an increase in their benefits next year.
Cost of living adjustments (COLA) that beneficiaries receive are calculated under a formula set by law. The low inflation rate resulting from the economic crisis is what is keeping the Social Security amounts from rising. This will be the first time since 1975 beneficiaries do not receive a COLA.
--------------------
Please note that you can view previous issues of the Capitol Insider, at thearc.org anytime by choosing "Capitol Insider" under "Public Policy."

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me at
mailto:acosta@thedpc.org

Sincerely,

Annie Acosta
Director of Communications and Grassroots Advocacy
Disability Policy Collaboration

----------
Website: Practitioner Issues in Behavior Analysis SIG
-----------
Views and news expressed in this blog or by the PIBA SIG are those of the SIG and SIG members and do not represent official policy of ABA International or other official body. For official policy of the Association of Behavior Analysis International, the reader is directed to their website, http://www.abainternational.org